2012 左永安顧問 安永經營管理商學院 EMBA 共通核心職能 TTQS 營運管理個案討論 衡計分卡(BSC)的策略地圖目標The Goal-A Process of Ongoing Improvement 限制理論(Theory Of Constraints, TOC)的創始人高德拉博士(Dr. Eli.Goldratt)曾藉由簡單的譬喻來闡述企業經營。他把企業比做一條需要乘載負荷的鏈條,鏈條連結在一起,象徵企業完整的團隊營運系統,必須能夠承受巨大的衝擊力量,才能從中創造價值。


創新經營/導入限制理論 突破瓶頸


【經濟日報╱張寶誠】


2012.03.26
 
限制理論(Theory Of Constraints, TOC)的創始人高德拉博士(Dr. Eli.Goldratt)
The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement


Written in a fast-paced thriller style, The Goal is the gripping novel which is transforming management thinking throughout the Western world. The author has been described by Fortune as a 'guru to industry' and by Businessweek as a 'genius'. It is a book to recommend to your friends in industry - even to your bosses - but not to your competitors. 

Alex Rogo is a harried plant manager working ever more desperately to try and improve performance. His factory is rapidly heading for disaster. So is his marriage. He has ninety days to save his plant - or it will be closed by corporate HQ, with hundreds of job losses. It takes a chance meeting with a colleague from student days - Jonah - to help him break out of conventional ways of thinking to see what needs to be done. 

The story of Alex's fight to save his plant is more than compulsive reading. It contains a serious message for all managers in industry and explains the ideas which underline the Theory of Constraints (TOC) developed by Eli Goldratt. Eliyahu M. Goldratt is an internationally recognized leader in the development of new business management concepts and systems, and acts as an educator to many of the world's corporations. The 20th anniversary edition includes a series of detailed case study interviews by David Whitford, Editor at Large, Fortune Small Business, which explore how organizations around the world have been transformed by Eli Goldratt's ideas.



Eliyahu Goldratt's "The Goal" is an entertaining novel and at the same time a thought provoking business book. The story is about a plant manager, Alex Rogo, whose plant and marriage are going downhill. He finds himself in the unenviable position of having ninety days in which to save his plant. A fortuitous meeting with an old acquaintance, Jonah, introduces him to the Theory of Constrains (TOC). He uses this new way of thinking to ...
TOC postulates that for an organization to have an ongoing process of improvement, it needs to answer three fundamental questions:
1. What to change?
2. To what to change?
3. How to cause the change?
The goal is to make (more) money, which is done by the following:
1. Increase Throughput
2. Reduce Inventory
3. Reduce Operating Expense
Goldratt defines throughput (T) as the rate at which the system generates money through sales. He also defines inventory (I) as everything the system invests in that it intends to sell. Operating expense (OE) is defined as all the money the system spends in order to convert inventory into throughput.
The author does an excellent job explaining his concepts, especially how to work with constraints and bottlenecks (processes in a chain of processes, such that their limited capacity reduces the capacity of the whole chain). He makes the reader empathize with Alex Rogo and his family and team. Don't be surprised if you find yourself cheering for Alex to succeed.
The importance and benefits of focusing on the activities that are constraints are clearly described with several examples in "The Goal". One example from the book is the one in which Alex takes his son and a group of Boy Scouts out on a hiking expedition. Here Alex faces a constraint in the form of the slowest boy, Herbie. Alex gets to apply two of the principles Jonah talked to him about - "dependent events" (events in which the output of one event influences the input to another event) and "statistical fluctuations" (common cause variations in output quantity or quality). He realizes that in a chain of dependent processes, statistical fluctuations can occur at any step. These result in time lags between the processes that accumulate and grow in size further down the chain. This leads to the performance of the system becoming worse than the average capacity of the constraint.
It is interesting to note that TOC practitioners often refer to TOC concepts in terms of references from this book. For example, a constraint is often called a Herbie.
The Goldratt Institute (goldratt dot com) has illustrated TOC Analysis in the form of five steps used as a foundation upon which solutions are built:
1. Identify the constraint
2. Decide how to exploit the constraint
3. Subordinate and synchronize everything else to the above decisions
4. Elevate the performance of the constraint
5. If, in any of the above steps the constraint has shifted, go back to Step 1
Although this book is excellent in the context of Operations, the "Goal" to "make (more) money by..." is limited in its focus. It is concerned with the cost centers internal to a business. Business performance in today's increasingly competitive market depends on a variety of factors that exist outside the business. These include competitors, external opportunities, customers and the non-customers. Executives need to focus on these in order to see the bigger picture.
This book is necessary reading at the best MBA programs. In addition to being a review, this write-up was intended to serve as a summary of the core concepts of this book and TOC. If you are reading this as part of your coursework, please feel free to share the link with your fellow students.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

24 of 26 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Concepts from The GoalFebruary 21, 2005
By
Ted Kantrow (New York, NY) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement (Paperback)
The author of this business novel thinks he's the Messiah. The gist of the 384-page book could have been expressed in a page, and some of it is obvious. But it may be useful anyway, and it's an entertaining read.

His schtick is that one can achieve great gains by identifying the bottlenecks ('constraints') that are blocking improved performance toward your goal, and then doing anything necessary to unblock those constraints - even if this means inefficiently using other non-bottleneck resources.

He says that one should think of the cost of each resource as including its effect on the whole system. So if a machine costs $1K/month to operate, but its rate of production is preventing the business from accepting or fulfilling extra orders that would represent $10K/month in profits, then the true cost of the machine is $11K.

It follows that anything one can do to remove that bottleneck would be worthwhile, provided it adds less than the amount saved to the cost and doesn't introduce a new bottleneck. It's fine if you have to overpay for other resources or use them inefficiently as long as you accomplish this.

It then becomes a matter of analyzing and brainstorming all the ways that bottleneck can be reduced. For instance:

- Can extra capacity be added, even if it is less efficient or uses antiquated equipment or is outsourced to a vendor?

- Can you prioritize the use of the bottlenecked resource so that high-profit and time-sensitive work comes first?

- Can you divert work that doesn't need to go through the bottleneck, even if it would then go through another more cumbersome process?

- Can you prevent work from reaching the bottleneck if Quality Control will eventually reject it?

- Can you increase the rate of output of the bottleneck resource by doubling up batches?

This logic applies regardless of the nature of the bottleneck - whether it relates to a machine (production capacity), marketing effort (how much business is coming in), or any other element of one's environment.

To help identify the bottlenecks and judge tradeoffs, one should identify one's goal as a measure (in a business context this is generally profits or ROI), then identify the factors that influence that measurement and create an equation. For instance,

Profits = Sales - Cost of Inputs - Cost of Transforming Inputs

or,

Return On Investment = (Sales - Cost of Inputs - Cost of Transforming Inputs) / Money Trapped In Unfinished Goods And Inventory

Essentially, his thesis is that by focusing on these bottlenecks, and analyzing and brainstorming their solutions, one takes advantage of the 80/20 rule by prioritizing those few factors that most greatly impact one's performance.

The most rewarding part of the book are the examples in the Testimonials section at the end. The testimonials describe creative solutions to tough bottleneck situations. The book doesn't help the reader come up with this type of creative solution - it only mentions where to look for the problem. Here are the memorable examples he cites:

1. A large office supply company (similar to Staples) was losing business to companies that were charging very low prices. Investigating this marketing bottleneck, they determined that from the customers' perspective, the larger problem was the overall cost of stocking and procuring and purchasing and tracking the office supplies.

Rather than competing on price, its owner fixed the Sales bottleneck with an innovative concept, where they arranged to place fully stocked cabinets filled with office supplies throughout their client companies, just like a hotel minibar. They'd visit each week, restock any items that were used, and charge the company for the items that were removed, thereby saving the company the aggravation and cost of even having to purchase or account for office supplies. They also supplied each customer with detailed information regarding what was used, when. In exchange for this unique convenience, they charged higher prices and achieved large profit margins.

2. A printing company, constrained by the number of presses available to print jobs, made more efficient use of its presses by routing jobs to different types of presses in a way that would maximize the total output of the presses.

3. A manufacturing company's output was limited by a saw that cut pipes. They dug up an old, inefficient saw, put it to work to remove that bottleneck, and increased output and profits significantly.

4. In the book itself, the protagonist's factory increased its Return On Investment (profit/money tied up) by shortening the time it took for a product to be manufactured (as doing that reduced the money tied up, hence increased ROI). This was accomplished by removing delays that were keeping costly unfinished products sitting around the plant. For instance, by reducing the 'batch size', a product would wait less time for its batch to be complete, allowing it to move to the next step of production sooner.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

9 of 10 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars It' so much more than a business book on meeting the goalDecember 5, 2005
This review is from: The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement (Paperback)
I didn't know what to expect when I began reading this novel about a manufacturing plant. As provider of a professional (legal and risk management) services, I initially thought this wouldn't have much application for me. But it certainly does. First, the story itself, told as a novel, is an enjoyable read. This must be the first business book that I didn't want to put down until I had finished reading it from cover to cover!

Key points in the book include the principle of finding and then focusing on the one true goal and not getting caught up on a lot of side issues that others (even others in management) might think are the goal. This requires learning how to stop and really look at the problem. It then requires new ways to look for and try potential solutions. This includes ask penetrating questions of yourself and others who may provide key information and insights. And it requires really listening to what the affected people have to say about different aspects of achieving the goal.

An important point that is made is that every individual within the organization has part of the knowledge needed to reach the goal, and that we need to create a genuine environment where we not only encourage their participation but we also teach everyone how to ask the right questions so they can see for themselves what needs to be done to achieve the goal.

Incidentally, the partnership of communication that ultimately develops between the lead character and his employees and superiors overflows into his relationship with his spouse and naturally changes their relationship as well. There is much to be learned from this book, and I can see why it has been such a huge success for so many years.
 
曾藉由簡單的譬喻來闡述企業經營
他把企業比做一條需要乘載負荷的鏈條
鏈條連結在一起,象徵企業完整的團隊營運系統,必須能夠承受巨大的衝擊力量
才能從中創造價值。
某些限制因素,會使鏈條無法承受負荷而應聲斷裂
這鏈條中  最弱的環節   就是「限制因素」,也就是一般所說的瓶頸
也就是說,
企業內部各個部門工作必須互相、緊密配合,才能  讓投入的資源 獲得
最大  的  價值  創造  

最高  的  投資 報酬
但從實務上
企業受限於   部門、人員及作業   等各種   不確定因素   的阻礙
無法有效     實現  營運利潤    最大化   的目標
企業可透過TOC的診斷,檢測出企業價值鏈中的限制因素(瓶頸)
並運用有限資源逐一突破限制因素,以達成營運總體目標   與 落實策略 思考模式 
為企業建立一套完整的架構與管理手法
協助快速尋找限制因素,提升附加價值與經濟效益
導入限制理論可歸納五項步驟為:
思考程序  中    TOC提供了分析工具,協助企業透過   繪製樹狀圖   找    出核心問題
找出的限制因素後進行突破對策時,經常出現對立矛盾現象,
可利用「對立消解法(衝突圖)」方法,尋求最佳的解決方案。
對立消解法可經由以下步驟來達成:
雖然「對立消解圖」可以協助    釐清    問題  與  衝突點
進而  找到    解決問題  的   真正   突破點,但並非是   充分 且 完整   的解決方案。
應更進一步運用未來對策結構樹狀圖(未來圖)
在現狀圖上將每一策略構想放置到要突破的環節
重新繪製邏輯連接,在現況圖的基礎上形成未來圖
步驟三:促進其他條件配合限制條件執行
解決限制瓶頸方案時,其他環節應在改善時完全配合限制解決方案
這種理念與作法可以在最短時間內集中企業能量,以單點突破方式改善
步驟四:強化限制條件

改善  核心問題   必須有    配套措施,若   

 不能有   其他配合措施   加以  制度化

不但未能真正解決原本的限制條件,反而製造更多有形、無形的瓶頸

當最大限制條件解除後
系統上原來「次要」的限制因素又會變成阻礙整體目標的新瓶頸
必須依循一到四的步驟改善
運用TOC,可以找出企業阻礙,達成最佳化,成功關鍵要素包括:
1.領導者秉持願景、使命的經營理念,宣誓決心、全力參與改善並給予應有的資源
2.建立激勵、獎懲制度
   鼓勵積極正向的參與文化,並藉此發覺   組織內革新   的人才
   對改善貢獻的成員,應給予適時且實質的獎勵
3.改善行動   應由 ,將顧問的輔導作為諮詢的機會 內部發動
  加強成員    主動議題  與  思考    的能力,以  形塑    自主改善  的  環境
4.組織成員基於共同價值觀與目標  做出   承諾,激發   達成目標 的  熱情與責任感
  持續保持    靈活與思維   來   對抗   慣性
 
面對瞬息萬變的競爭環境


在火線上衝鋒陷陣的企業都了解到    資源整合  與   策略聚焦  的重要性


然而,面對外在環境改變的衝擊,以及內部組織、人員及流程


等種種不確定的因素


使得企業常常    無法有效實現    營運利潤最大化  的  目標


因此,近年來有不少企業運用限制理論(Theory of Constraints, TOC)


的思維與管理模式進行改善,期望快速突破瓶頸限制,有效提升經營效益


達成願景目標及策略


現今企業的營運機制  依   專業分工區分   為不同的部門,隨著組織的發展與擴編


部門間的合作  與  互動  逐漸淡化,各部門所著眼的   往往是部門的最佳化效益


太過強調局部最佳化的效益,往往忽略了資源投入是否合乎整體最佳化的結果


造成各部門局部最佳化的總合,並不代表整體企業的最佳化


而且還會  對企業的團隊合作造成衝突


部門最佳化總合≠ 企業最佳化


限制理論創始人高德拉特博士(Dr. Eli. Gol-dratt)


運用一個簡單的比喻,來闡述企業經營


他將企業比擬為一條需要承載負荷的鏈條


此鏈條


必須能夠承受強大的衝擊力量,從中創造出價值


組織的各部門也必須緊密地配合,才能讓投入的資源產生最大的價值


進而創造出最高的投資報酬


某些限制因素(瓶頸)會使鏈條無法承受負荷,而應聲斷裂


鏈條中最弱的環節就是限制因素,透過TOC的診斷


可以在繁雜的企業價值鏈中,檢測出限制因素


運用有限的資源逐一突破限制因素


換句話說,運用TOC,可以找出企業或組織中阻礙達成最佳化的因素


這個 限制    決定了   企業或組織  達成  目標  的速度,只要從克服限制著手


就能以更快的速度在短時間內提升系統的產出,有助於達成營運總體目標


提高整體效益與價值


也就是從瓶頸管理出發,透過持續性地去除瓶頸與限制


以達到全面營運的改善 與  最大利益  的追求


運用TOC強化營運效益


國內外已有許多企業運用TOC的思維與方法


結合各種管理方法與技術,來解決企業運作過程中所出現的問題與瓶頸


以取得更高的營運效益


福特汽車、波音公司、通用汽車等歐美企業為例


皆從中獲得顯著的成果。


通用汽車   數年前即開始採用TOC  改善汽車裝配廠  的  流程


找出     裝配線的瓶頸  和  問題有效提高產出


之後更將TOC的觀念   延伸至   設計  與  製程


此外,


在日本,TOC也有顯著的導入成果,並已發展出專屬於日本企業的TOC管理模式


運用TOC有效提升產值與價值的日本企業,涵蓋了


高科技、汽車、精密工具、製藥等行業三菱樹脂、NEC


等企業導入TOC之後產生明顯效益,


TOC也因此被譽為「日本製造業復甦的強力技術」


在台灣,雖然企業界運用TOC思維與技術的時間並不長


但也有些企業正著手導入TOC,或是  運用TOC結合其他管理技術


相互配合運用,以提升企業效能


 

限制理論(TOC)的運作,在實際執行上需從顧客導向出發


實施的基礎在於


充分  達成  共識   的


1.企業文化

2.績效管理

3.策略願景


的結合


 
思維改革最重要


由「創新思維」開始啟動,在「共識的經營理念與願景」領航下


營造出  組織共享  的價值觀,強調  價值創造體系  中  有限資源  的  效率化配適


透過    平衡計分卡(BSC)的策略地圖   展開一系列


價值創造    策略   與  方案   與   績效   


達成關鍵瓶頸的突破


值得強調的是,參與成員的思維改革極為最重要。


過去被賦予目標、只管努力朝目標邁進的成員,必須主動考量市場狀況


為了實現創造利潤的目標,以主動進攻的姿態執行業務


也就是說,除了經營者和管理者之外


每一位成員也必須本著「經營者意識」去展開活動,這也是TOC的的要求


一般而言,TOC推動的最大障礙


來自組織   無法揚棄舊有的   觀念、思維模式及慣性


以致於無法接受   


 1.新觀念


 2.訂定新指標       


  3.新的績效衡量方式




成功關鍵七要素


此外,企業導入TOC管理模式進行改善時,必須特別注意以下的關鍵成功要素:


1.TOC導入的目標與範圍是否明確


2.TOC導入的可行行性分析與規劃,是否完整且適當


3.改善小組的組織是否健全、穩定,並獲得企業最高階層的授權與積極支援


4.TOC導入期間,各部門是否建立系統性   良好的溝通管道


5.TOC展開時   是否有   具體的  績效衡量模式,以評估成果是否符合預期


6.TOC導入期間,組織內是否建立良好的、積極的、團隊合作的氛圍


7.專案人員對TOC的思考程序是否完全了解,且有能力找出企業內真正的  經營瓶頸


在日趨嚴苛的競爭壓力下


快速滿足顧客於品質、成本、交期各方面的需求


只是   企業生存  的  必要條件


能夠  有效提升  顧客價值,協助  顧客邁向成功   ,方是永續經營的根基


此時,導入一套創新思維的TOC管理模式


利用有限的資源突破企業真正的瓶頸點,有助企業達成跳躍性成長


最後,要特別提醒的是,當企業突破了一個瓶頸限制


也代表著另一個瓶頸的產生,改善永無止境,業千萬別忘了TOC的中心思維


———持續改善,唯有持續不斷的改善行動,才是企業永保競爭優勢的保證
評估制度

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    tsuoscott 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()